Facebook ČKZ 


Archive of past issues of the Journal for critique of science

Issue No. 251 - ¡No pasaran! Notes from Antifa seminar (1/4 2013)

ČKZ številka 251 - No pasaran! Zapisi s seminarja antifa


¡No pasaran! Notes from Antifa seminar

(ČKZ No. 251 - 1/4 2013)


pp. 22–31 by Jernej A. Prodnik

A Note on Fascist Practices (and the Emergence of Neo-Fascism)

The author provides a theoretical analysis of the concept of fascism, which he then applies to the present political-economic and political circumstances. He proposes that to understand fascism it is important to separate it from the historical context, while it is at the same time of crucial importance to embed it into the current historical processes in the society. Only this kind of abstraction will enable us to consider fascism in a patently changed, but in many ways similar social context. Furthermore a differentiation is suggested between a completely formed fascist order on the one hand, and fascist institutions, processes, practices and discourses on the other.

This can provide a possible distinction between a macro-level perspective, which focuses on the wider social structures and systems, and micro-practices and micro-politics, which operate at the level of everyday activities. Such differentiation is important because a suitable social context is always a prerequisite for a totally integrated (fascist) order. It is always the social context that helps to transfer fascist micro-practices into the wider and often institutional social level (for example into a broadened complex of fascist apparatuses and institutions on the national or supra-national level that potentially enable the establishment of a fascist order). This also helps us to redefine the hard and sharp opposition between fascist and non-fascist societies: in different historical moments the movement from seemingly benign fascist practices toward a proto-fascist social context and finally to a totally constructed fascist system is always possible. Defined and rethought in this way, fascism can be observed and analyzed as a movement and a process, not only as a (fully constructed and stable, often de-contextualized) structure.

Keywords: fascism, neo-fascism, fascist practices, neoliberalism, capitalism, post-democracy

Jernej Amon Prodnik is a Research fellow at the Social Communication Research Centre and Assistant to the Teaching Process at the Media Studies Department (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia). His principal research interests encompass the broad field of political economy of communication. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

pp. 34–53 by Robert Bobnič, Andreja Vezovnik

Discourse on Islam or Dispositif of Statements and Object: The case of the Islamic religious and cultural centre

The article deals with the notion of dispositif, which consists of discursive and non-discursive phenomena, of enouncements and objects. The article shows how the Islamic religious-cultural centre (IVKC) works as a dispositif, formed by enouncements mediated thorugh the public media and the architectural design of the centre to be built in Ljubljana. The first part of the analysis focuses on the level of enouncements transmitted by the Slovenian public media in two time periods – i.e. 20032008, and partly in 2009. The authors claim that the arguments against IVKC are grounded in essentialist assumptions and upgraded by the phantasmatic threat of Islam as well as by its mystification. In the second part, the authors focus on the analysis of the architectural solutions of IVKC itself and show how the level of enouncements complements the material/architectural level. Indeed, as much as the enouncements mystify Islam and see the minaret as a conqueror of the Slovenian territory, to the same extent the architecture of IVKC demystifies and castrates. By introducing the notion of transparency and of public areas, by lowering the minaret and incorporating a »modern Western architectural style«, the authors claim that IVKC works less as an Islamic religious and cultural facility and more as a self-normalizing institution.

Keywords: Islam, Islamic religious and cultural centre, enouncements, architecture, dispositive, panopticon transparency, phantasmatic, mystification, normalization

Dr. Andreja Vezovnik is an assistant professor at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana. For a number of years she has been working as a teacher and researcher in the field of communication and cultural studies. She is author of a monograph called Discourse. and co-author or editor of numerous monographs, research and scientific articles.(This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Robert Bobnič is an editor on the Culture and Humanities editorial board at Radio Student Ljubljana. He was Editor-in-Chief for the Tribuna newspaper between 2011 and 2012. He also published in several other Slovenian media, especially in the field of alternative media. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 54–60 by Metka Mencin Čeplak

The Innocence of Scientific »Truths«

The article presents a case of »scientific« argument supporting racism in psychology (»Cattell controversy«). The author argues that scientific racism in psychology should not be considered as an excess but rather as a symptom. It is not limited to a few cases of eugenicist and evolutionary psychologists; it is closely tied to the genetic reductionist concept of a person and of psychological differences, and to the role of psychological knowledge in (bio) power relations. It concludes with comments on the social responsibility of scientists and points out that scientific conclusions cannot be detached from their effects.  

Keywords: psychology, differences, racism, eugenics

Metka Mencin Čeplak (psychologist, PhD) lectures on Social and Political Psychology and Identities at the University of Ljubljana (Slovenia), Faculty for Social Sciences. Her main research interests are the construction of stigmatized identities and (re)production of power relations, particularly in the field of education. She has coauthored several monographs on values and life orientations of young people in Slovenia. She has also published on discrimination and identity politics, and on critical psychology. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 64–72 by Lana Zdravković

The Possibility of the Impossible or »We will not Pay for your Crisis!«

In the extremely antipolitical time of the turbo-capitalistic way of shaping society, which cosiders that profit is more important than people – and animals, nature, social relations … actually anything – it became obvious that rethinking new concepts of democracy, representation and identitarianism or communitarism, which are presented to us as self-evident, unchangeable/eternal and final and which not only camouflage that catastrophic situation but also actively support and reproduce it – is needed. What that concept with all its attributes really produces, encourages and preserves is the fear of equality, which paralyses each emancipatory action. The article aims to rethink the possibility of emancipatory politics and consequently to open up the question of alternative ways of shaping society, to be based on solidarity, justice and equality of everyone, and not based on profit, competition and exploitation. To achieve that, the text examines the ways and possibilities of resistance and considers the aims of the protagonists and the places of this resistance as key political issues of our time.

Keywords: emancipation, resistance, Sameness, possibility of impossible

Lana Zdravković is researcher at the Peace Institute, political activist, publicist and performer and producer at the KITCH Institute. Her main field of interest is the politics of emancipation. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

pp. 77– 80 by Gal Kirn

Fascism in the Core of Germany: The New Idea of Europe

The author diagnoses the discursive shift in the core of Europe, where the neofascist tendency is not only a matter of the margins. It is not restricted to the cliche of the unemployed working class poor from Eastern Germany, but rather it has migrated into the main political parties. As a symptomatic example of this neofascist turn the author analyzes the bestseller Germany Is Abolishing Itself, the literary and quasi-scientific achievement from Thillo Sarazzin, once a member of the German Federal Bank and still a member of Social Democrats. This recent best-seller made politically incorrect vocabulary on Muslims a legitimate scientific argument. In the light of contemporary neoliberal restructuring of the economic crisis, and the role Germany plays within it, one could start speaking about the rise of »nationalliberalism«.
Keywords: neofascism in Germany, anti-Islam, new Europe, Sarazzin, nationalliberalism

Gal Kirn holds a PhD in political philosophy dealing with the work of Louis Althusser and history of socialist Yugoslavia. He is a co-editor of Encountering Althusser (Bloomsbury, 2013) and Surfing the Black. Transformative Moments in Yugoslav Cinema (JvE, 2012), and an editor of Post-Fordism and its Discontents (JvE, 2010). He was a research fellow at the JvE Akademie (Maastricht) and ICI (Berlin), and at the moment he is conducting research at Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 84–90 by Maca Jogan

The 70th Anniversary of the Foundation of the Liberation Front of the Slovenian Nation: About and on the Round Table “But we didn’t submit to their wild power…”

In 2011 over 70 years had passed since the foundation of the Liberation Front of the Slovenian Nation which linked the majority of the Slovenian people in defence against the military occupantion during WWII. At present, knowledge about fascism and Nazism, about the cruelties and violent ethnocide carried out by German, Italian and Hungarian occupation troops is very limited, particularly among youth educated after the changes in the political system in Slovenia and the establishment of an independent state (1991). Scant and superficial is also their knowledge on the organized activity of the Liberation Front in the national liberation fight. For this reason the round table “We didn’t submit to their wild power…” was organised as part of the Anti-Fa seminar at the Faculty of Social Sciences (1 March 2011). Its aim was to renew interest in and expand public awareness of the LF, and also to evaluate its programme according to past and present social conditions (including a comparison with resistance movements in other European countries. The discussion was intended to contribute to raising sensitivity to various new forms of fascist or Nazi tendencies.  This article outlines the broad circumstances during the last two decades, characterized by the denial and disregard of the LF’s importance on one hand and by the direct or indirect legitimization of collaboration with the occupation forces on the other. This cleavage of the historic memory was also raised in the discussions of the round table. The LF was seen as a unique historic organization and the final assessment of its work was predominantly positive.

Keywords: Anti-fascism, Liberation Front of the Slovenian Nation, split collective historic memory, legitimization of collaboration

Maca Jogan (1943) is a professor emeritus at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Her main research is in the fields of the history of sociological theory and of gender sociology. She is author of  (in Slovene): Sociology of Order (1978), Women and Discrimination (1986), Women, Church and Family (1986), Social Construction of Gender Hierarchy (1990), Contemporary Streams in Sociological Theory (1995), Sexism in Everyday Life (2001). (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 92–99 by Alen Toplišek

The Significance of Freedom of Expression in an Antagonistic Society: Critical Understanding of Fascist Discourses and Linguistic Vulnerability

In this article I will address the complex relations between linguistic vulnerability as it is understood and construed by Judith Butler, and the freedom of expression in an antagonistic society that was conceptualized by Chantal Mouffe. The purpose of this article is to move away from the dominant moralizing discourse which tackles the emergence of fascistic and hateful discursive practices uncritically and in a politically neutral manner, and then offer an alternative view of the paradox between the freedom of expression and the regulation of hate speech. First, I concentrate on the performative functioning of words that injure and the question of how to subvert this discursive subjection that the hate speaker is seeking to constitute in a way that will enable the critical agency of the one injured. Butler’s post-structuralist view on the performance of discursive acts reveals potential sites and possibilities for critical agency. With her critical analysis of moderate consensus politics, Mouffe identifies the narrowing of the political space for articulation of antagonistic relations in society as the effect of the dominant post-political rationality. At the end I come to the conclusion that generating open discursive spaces is of crucial importance for the facilitation of critical subversion of hateful contents and restoring a state of normality.

Keywords: linguistic vulnerability, freedom of expression, hate speech, consensus, critical agency

Alen Toplišek has an LLM in International Development Law and Human Rights from the University of Warwick and now he is doing a PhD in political theory at Queen Mary College, University of London. Every month, he writes for a collaborative blog Refleksije, and from time to time he also interviews critical thinkers for Mladina magazine. ( This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 102–110 by Irina Vincić

Invisible Workers of the World as an Autonomous Space of Migrant Workers

The case of migrant workers in Slovenia is the basis for this article which deals with the question of exclusivity and the hierarchical nature of citizenship. Migrant workers are not seen as passive objects, but as entities that challenge the existing definition of citizenship and demand the expansion of civil rights. Labour migration in Slovenia is defined on the basis of strategic documents governing the so-called secondary labor market, at the same time creating what Etienne Balibar calls real European racism. This has galvanized migrant workers in Slovenia to organize in a movement called Invisible Workers of the World (IWW), which can be seen as a revolt against the current visa regime. With their struggle to expand freedoms and destabilize restrictive migration policies, migrant workers have become an important part of social reality. This article also deals with both the permanent and temporary tools and the methodologies being used by activists of the movement to organize their struggle. The IWW movement itself has become an important autonomous entity whose activity cannot be ignored.

Keywords: migration, Invisible Workers of the World, citizenship rights, migrant workers

Irina Vinčić holds a Master of Political Science and is a activist of the Invisible Workers of the World movement. She has participated in various meetings and round tables, which were organized by the local and the European movements, non-governmental organizations and research collectives. She works as a journalist and as a volunteer at various non-governmental organizations. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 116–126 by Mitja Velikonja

The Continuation of Politics by Other Means. Neo-Fascist Graffiti and Street Art in Slovenia

This article analyses graffiti and street-art production by extreme right-wing groups in Slovenia. Classification of the main topics and identification of groups of authors is followed by a critical analysis. This production can be understood along the line of modern–postmodern fascism. Modern fascism is direct, exclusive, aggressive, while the postmodern one is even more dangerous, because it looks inclusive, conciliatory, and its language seems integrative. However, their final goal is identical: hierarchical, authoritarian, ethnically and culturally homogenous and corporative society. The basic finding of the study is that hate-speech on the walls and the policies of dominant institutions are basically the same, so we can speak about the continuation of the same politics by other means. Everything that is written in the graffiti has already been said from the pulpits of dominant politics. Finally, examples of »decontamination« of public spaces are listed, i.e. removal of extremist graffiti and street art or their creative subversion.

Keywords: graffiti, street art, neonazism, chauvinism, urban subcultures, anti-fascism, Slovenia

Mitja Velikonja is full professor of Cultural Studies and head of the Centre for Cultural and Religious Studies at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana. He is the author of six monographs and co-author of another one, and has contributed numerous chapters and articles to Slovenian and international anthologies and social science journals. He was visiting professor at Jagiellonian University in Krakow (2002, 2003) and at Columbia University in New York (2009); he was a Fulbright visiting researcher at Rosemont College in Philadelphia (2004/2005) and a research fellow at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Wassenaar (2012). (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 127–138 by Srđan Sušnica

Reoccupying Public Space by Hatred and Ethnic Cleansing - Case study: Banja Luka

The article analyses the symbolism and the meaning of ethno-religious graffiti, slogans and stickers especially as they are used on the streets of Banja Luka. The city used to be a strategic centre for armed forces but is today the political centre of Republika Srpska (RS), supposedly a legitimate military conquest of the people of Serbia. Responses in ethno-religious graffiti can be turbulent. In our case, narrative and visual codes transmit dominant messages and myths of the Serbian ethnical corpus which can easily become hate speech, especially in the post-war context, in which ethno-religious differences are being brought to the fore, war crimes and armed victories are being exalted and expressions of non-tolerance are common. This aggressive visibility of »ours« pushes all the rest and anyone who is different into invisibility and self-censoring. The article researches characteristics and the quality of connection between the production and the results of ethno-fascistic speech in graffiti and in the messages of the RS ethno-political elites in public forums, regulations and media spaces. A contextual interpretation of a graffiti discourse, which was formed in the midst of civil war, ethnic cleansing, attacks on and the separation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and activities of political elites in RS, is offered. The intimate connection between street discourse and that of political elites shows that a populist legitimization of the activities of the RS is still a political goal that also triggers the process of forgetting the region’s multi-ethnic past. In Banja Luka, this process offers a »national and spiritual« legitimacy for the existence of RS and seeks to make the city a part of the Serbian ethnic community. It offers an unconvincing cultural-political and war-emancipatory »continuity« and »normality« for the RS and covers up its real intention of bloodshed from which it had emerged. In this it is consistent with Eco’s notion of Ur-Fascism. 

Keywords: street art, public space, ethno-religious graffiti, hate speech, nationalism, ethnic cleansing, ethno-political elite, ethno-fascism, Banja Luka (BiH)

Srđan Šušnica holds a Diploma in Law and is a M. A. student of cultural and religious studies in the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana. He regularly publishes articles. Living in Banja Luka, he is a creative part of the studio for cultural activism s.a.j.t.u.m. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 143–146 by Asja Hrvatin

Austerity, Discipline and Social Security

One of the manifestations of the global crisis of financial capitalism and the policies arising from it was the imposition of austerity measures, which not only resulted in privatization of the commons and general expropriation of the people, but also managed to introduce new mechanisms of discipline and punishment. Debt, being the fundament of relations in society, forced itself into the system of social security: new legislation, regulating welfare benefits, has now shifted to a method for the criminalization of poverty, deepening class differences and transforming social workers (and the system of social security as a whole) into a moralizing, bureaucratic machine for disciplining the population. The new legislation also shows a lack of reflection on the changes that need to be made to the welfare state in order to create social services that meet the needs and desires of individuals. Instead of improvements that provide decent living conditions and a new system of social rights (to deal with the problems resulting from precarious working conditions), people are faced with depersonalization, humiliation and increased hate speech and other fascist practices.
The effect of austerity measures on the social security system does not end with the devastation of service users’ lives and their communities, which are slowly becoming exhausted, individualized and devoid of solidarity. It also means a big step backwards for the core ethics and principles of social work. Social workers are increasingly alienated from their clients and the communities they live in. They function more in the service of the government and its policies rather than as advocates of people’s rights.

Keywords: debt, expropriation of the system of social security, mechanisms of discipline, transformations of identity, direct social work

Asja Hrvatin is a student of social work at the University of Ljubljana. She was an activist of the 15o movement. Her interests lie mainly in community mental health care and working within activist collectives of different autonomous spaces. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 148–153 by Jure Lesjak

Discussing an (un)Usual Approach to Comprehending Football

In the introduction the author presents some reflections, interpretations and misconceptions about football. The main emphasis is on the irrelevant contextualization(s). Two key questions are highlighted: on the one hand, the connection between football and its installation into the vast social and political context – because of its global dimensions football can be viewed as an important structural component in the global capitalist system. On the other hand, the article tries to draw the (perilous) distinction between the understanding of »football« (in its broadest definition) and »the game of football« (concerning its philosophy and complexity). From that point of view the author focuses on a certain aspect in the game of football where relations between players are based on relatively equal roles – this concept is the origin of representing the idea and potential of different forms of association and integration between individuals, collectives and communities.

Keywords: football, sport, capitalism, emancipation, communities

Jure Lesjak is a doctoral student at the Faculty of Social Sciences in Ljubljana and an active football player at FC Peca from Črna na Koroškem. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 159–167 by Dejan Savić

Against Generationism. A Conceptual Outline of Justice for Future Generations

Humanity faces a global ecological crisis in the context of climate change which challenges established forms of political thought and action. The discussion of justice is applied to the future, where we understand time and the natural environment as a common bond between people from different periods. We put today’s generation in a relationship with the generations in the near and more distant future. The term »generacism«, describing the current way of thinking as another form of discrimination, allows us to show the inadequacy of our attitudes towards future generations. By destroying the global environment, we create injustice towards future generations on the basis of the time of peoples’ birth. In this context, time is understood as an arbitrary circumstance, which does not suffice as a basis for discriminating between people. We defend the concept of intergenerational justice that gives the state the responsibility for implementing environmental protection measures in order to protect future generations and eliminate generacism from our society and economy. We propose the so-called green state, which bases environmental protection measures on fairness to future generations.

Keywords: climate change, generacism, intergenerational justice, green state, John Rawls

Dejan Savić is a PhD student in philosophy at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Ljubljana. His research covers the field of justice to future generations in regards to environmental protection. From 2010 he has been working at the international environmental organization Greenpeace as a climate and energy campaigner in Slovenia. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 168–174 by Tomaž Grušovnik

Environmental Denial

Even though today reliable information about the negative impact of humans on the environment is only two clicks away, a considerable number of people still deny it. Why? Research shows that what we might call 'environmental denial' is a consequence of specific social and psychological factors: if we were to admit the negative impact of our lifestyles on the environment, we would have to change our way of life founded on consumerism. However, consumerism is not simply a way of exchanging goods; it is also something around which we organize the meaning of our lives, as consumer research clearly shows. Therefore we deny the information on the negattive impact of human activity on the environment because admitting it would lead to a conflict between cognition (attitudes, beliefs) and actions (behaviour) around which we organize the meaning of our lives. Such an exposition points to wider sociopolitical effects. Firstly, it raises questions about education that have to take into account the non-rational nature of human beings, and secondly it raises questions about the directions and possible outcomes of social action.

Keywords: environmental denial, environmental philosophy, environmental ethics

Tomaž Grušovnik is a senior lecturer at the University of Primorska where he teaches in the Faculty of Humanities and Faculty of Education. He was a Fulbright student at the University of New Mexico and guest lecturer at the Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo. He was awarded the Herald of science 2012 prize for his monograph on environmental ethics Shades of Green (Odtenki zelene). (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 176–178 by Suzana Tratnik

AntiFa Seminar in the Lesbian Quarter

The author interlaces a personal activist history and the rise of gay, feminist and finally lesbian initiatives in the 80s in Ljubljana. Influenced by the experiences of the international lesbian movement and the particular lesbian situation in the context of socialist Yugoslavia, the Slovenian lesbian movement itself often wavered between its natural allies: feminists and gays. Finally it attained independence as a Lesbian group LL within the ŠKUC Association, and the group now runs the lesbian Monokel club in the Metelkova squat. Since its beginning in 1987, it has developed a rich infrastructure of programs, activities and spaces.

Keywords: alternative scene, gay movement, feminist initiative, international lesbian conference, 3rd world lesbians, lesbian diversity and conflicts, lesbian allies, lesbian movement in Slovenia, Metelkova squat

Suzana Tratnik has obtained MA in Gender Anthropology. She is a fiction writer, translator, publicist and lesbian activist who lives and works in Ljubljana. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 179–183 by Nataša Sukič

25 Years of the Lesbian Section LL

Author describes the beginnings and the history of Škuc LL, the first activist lesbian group in Eastern Europe and former Yugoslavia. Trough projects within the cultural and political domains the group has been fighting against lesbophobia and homophobia for the last 25 years. The group tries to create an inclusive, united and egalitarian society of enlightment ideals. The author mixes personal activist history with a development of a lesbian movement from the first initiative in the alternative society of the 80s in Ljubljana to the situation today.

Keywords: alternative scene in the 80s, lesbian and gay movement, Magnus festival, lesbophobia, homophobia, society of enlightment, democratization of society, homosexuality in the media, the Lezbična četrt festival.

Nataša Sukič holds a Diploma and is a engineer in Electrotechnics. She is a writer, DJ and lesbian activist. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


pp. 185–193 by Franc Trček

Reflection on »Gotof je!«

This article combines two texts, which were written at the time of the third Maribor uprising in 2012. The first explains to an imaginary foreigner, why Gotof je! happened. In doing so, I start from the concept of primary accumulation of capital, which is typical for most of the transitions in Eastern European countries, and the failure of reform of local government in Slovenia, the consequence of which is local sheriffs. The second text is trying – through the analysis of actual political events in the city and municipality – to answer the question of what kind of election we need in Maribor. Both texts are a real-time analysis of the theory in practice. I call such attempts »weak theory« because the practice course ahead. I see this as a big advantage of weak theory, not as a weakness, because it not generalises where it is not possible.

Keywords: weak theory, Maribor uprising, primary accumulation of capital, transition, reform of local self-government, Gotof je!

Franc Trček is an active member of the Gotof si! movement. He is a resident of Maribor and analytical sociologist. He studies socio-spatial developmental challenges and in particular local and regional development, the sociology of architecture, cybersociology and Balkan studies. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


194–197 Klemen Ploštajner

Knowledge Must be Committed to Emancipation

The article considers the place of knowledge and the role of intellectuals in contemporary knowledge society in which knowledge is more and more subsumed under the logic of production and commodities. Subjects are supposed to know and their products (knowledge) are thus completely immersed in mechanisms of domination, which is practised more and more in the name of rational, technical, objective laws of capitalist production. The protest movement in Slovenia rejects the traditional status of intellectuals, forcing them to wake up and start using their knowledge as a tool of emancipation. If fascism represents a failure of revolution to achieve emancipation, then intellectuals have the task to prevent the march of fascism.

Keywords: protests, knowledge society, role of intellectuals, production

Klemen Ploštajner is an undergraduate student of Sociology in the Faculty of Social Science, University of Ljubljana. He is active in various local social movements. He is also one of the co-creators of danesjenovdan.si portal. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


199–209 Andrej Kurnik

A New Generation of Uprisings – from Tunisia to Slovenia

The uprising in Tunisia, the occupation of public squares in Spain, the Occupy Wall Street movement, the global uprising on 15 October 2011 and the recent widespread demonstrations in Slovenia can be understood as the new generation of uprisings following the eruption of financial crisis. Those multitudinal expressions of indignation and quests for real democracy are expressions of the irreversible crisis of neoliberalism and representative democracy. From an examination of the defining traits of uprisings from Tunisia to Slovenia, one can define basic theoretical and practical dilemmas in the new ways of doing political encounters. These include the relationship between the social and political dimensions of uprisings, the relationship between heterogeneity and forms of political organization, how resistance against financialization prefigures emerging forms of direct democracy, how emerging movements address the issue of direct democracy and minority rights, and what theoretical practices can prevent the attenuation of the discourse of uprisings and enable the free production of enunciations.

Keywords: uprisings, occupations, social and political, direct democracy, financial capitalism, neoliberalism

Andrej Kurnik is a lecturer at the Faculty of Social Sciences. He lectures in Political Philosophy, Genealogies of Citizenship, New Political Character and Global Movement, Biopolitics, and Politics of Migration. As an activist he works on developing methodologies of militant research. (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)


Prenesi PDF / Download PDF

Zrcalo/Mirror 1

Prenesi PDF / Download PDF (Mirror)

Zrcalo/Mirror 2

Prenesi PDF / Download PDF (Mirror)

Zrcalo/Mirror 3

Prenesi PDF / Download PDF (Mirror)